Section: Science & Technology
Title: Curbing Fake News
Relevance: GS 3
Why has this article surfaced?
The growth rates for media access on smartphones are astonishing in India. Equally disturbing however is the increasing instances of misleading and maliciously false online content. Social media and messaging services are increasingly being abused to incite communal riots and spread false information.
Implications of Fake News
- The phenomenon of fake news has wider implications for law and order, safety and security of the citizens, and to the democratic credentials of the country.
- Fake news, fake social media messages and campaigns have also been used to malign the reputation of organisations as well as to manipulate stock markets.
- Social media campaigns of political parties can easily transgress the boundaries of ethics if it includes doctored content and fake news. This also runs the risk of inciting religious or communal riots, hoaxes and rumours.
Finding solution: Artificial Intelligence
- As the interest in fake news and other illicit content grows, their implications for society and the individual in turn are grim.
- In the quest of finding an immediate solution to this, social media giants are experimenting with Artificial Intelligence (AI), which for decades has been used to curb spam emails.
- A simple AI solution for instance can run a content cross-check for the news story against a dynamic database of stories which demarcates legit and fake stories.
- A database of specific accounts, sources, geographical locations or IP addresses which are a known source of fake news, could also be handy for a quick check.
- AI systems can run an evaluation for the headline text and the content of the post, looking for consistency between both or sift through similar articles over other news media platforms for fact checking.
- AI is also being used to spot manipulated or doctored images and videos, which can further alert the users of the dubious content.
- Numerous fact-checking websites have sprung up and a few of them have even partnered with big players like Google and Facebook to provide factual accuracy.
Is AI efficient?
- The efficacy of AI in curbing the menace remains contentious, particularly when AI is being put to use to synthesise textual and media content which could be exceptionally convincing.
- As technology advances in machine and deep learning, it is quite possible that AI-generated fake content would be indistinguishable from real information for the AI-powered discriminator.
- Although AI can run a meticulous fact-checker with unparalleled speed and efficiency, it may fall short of understanding the nuances of human writing with adjectives, contexts and subtleties of tone.
- Some of the fake content can even confuse human beings, as it runs on the edges of fact and fiction.
- While AI may find it technically challenging to decipher such content, the majority and obvious cases of misinformation or falsified information can be identified.
- The race between the use and abuse of AI is gearing up, making it equally challenging for AI systems to detect professionally-made fake content using AI tools.
- AI also has its limitations in eradicating the fake news problem. It can, at the best, filter out or label the dubious content, similar to the spam filters in email boxes.
- AI is not an absolute answer or solution to this problem. This is largely a human versus technology problem, and a purely technology-led solution would fall short of producing effective results.
What else can be done to curb fake news?
- Due diligence on part of the users, as actual consumers and targets of fake information and online content, can contain the spread of fake news.
- Human judgement and wisdom is critical to solving this problem, but it needs extensive awareness and education campaigning.
- Users, aware of the basic fact-checking methods and societal fallouts of the fake information they share, are better positioned to contain its proliferation.
- Before sharing dubious content, users can exercise judgement to question the source and its credibility, or to check the credentials of the individual it has come from. This could act as barriers to this uncontrolled flow of falsified information.
- Leveraging the competence of human networks through crowd-sourcing, few experiments have been carried out for the fake news problem, similar to the concept of Wikipedia where a network of volunteers keeps the information updated.
- Network of volunteers, individuals as well as organisations, can maintain database for fact-checking and even point out the articles, posts, news content carrying falsified or fake information.
- AI-based content verification and labelling can also warn users if the content is likely to be fake or that the authenticity of the source is not established.
- By and large, eradicating the fake news problem calls for a collective effort of individuals, governments, social media and content platforms, and organisations producing innovative technology solutions.
- Standalone technology solutions cannot be effective, unless and until they are integrated with social causes and awareness among the masses to solve such mounting problems.
- At the end of the day, human wisdom can make the real difference, technology solutions can at the most augment human ability to differentiate between fake and real at the first look.
Â
Questions that arise
- Tackling fake content and news raises many questions. This includes decisions pertaining to:
- taking down of fake content,
- who makes that decision,
- or would it, in some way or the other, interfere with the freedom to speech or expression, and the manner in which technology should respond to parody and satire meant purely for entertainment.
- The larger question pertains to the very future of AI, with technology relating to fake content demarcation racing against technology used to generate fake content.
Conclusion
While fake news is a problem for every country across the globe, countries with stringent content controls, like China, are apparently in a better position to tackle the problem as they have both technical measures and legal regimes in place. The looming choice is whether it is always going to be a trade-off between freedom of expression and safety against fake content or whether the Chinese way is the right approach.
Human wisdom and technology can together put an end to the growing menace. The sooner it happens, the better it is for the society and the democratic ethos of developing countries like India.
