Gist of Editorials: An Intervention that leads to More Questions | GS – III


Relevance :  GS Paper  III


Why has this issue cropped up?

 Recently, Defence Minister appears to have altered a key pillar of India’s nuclear doctrine-No First Use .

India’s nuclear doctrine 

India’s nuclear doctrine consists of two pillars: 

  • “a credible minimum deterrent” and
  • “No First Use”.

Restraint as a pivotal point

  • Restraint has served India well in Kargil war 20 years ago.
  • Raising the nuclear threshold gave India sympathy in foreign capitals.
  • India’s restraint has formed the basis for its claims to belong to the nuclear mainstream —Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile Technology Control Regime, Wassenaar Arrangement and the Australia Group. .

Is revoking the commitment to NFU policy justified?

  • Revoking NFU leave India’s doctrine more ambiguous.
  • Ambiguity, in turn, can lead to miscalculations, by enemy country.
  • Adhering to the NFU does not symbolise weakness as India is committed to a devastating response to nuclear first use.
  • However, revoking NFU has led to a more muscular nuclear policy for India.

 

Leave a Reply