Editorial Simplified: It’s About Social Justice, not Welfare | GS – II


Relevance :  GS Paper  II


Theme of the Article

Reservation must be based on a rigorous identification of economic backwardness.


Why has this issue cropped up?

The introduction of the 124th constitutional amendment that provides the possibility of quotas for the “economically weaker sections” (EWS) has rekindled the debate on reservations.


Basic Structure Issue

  • Quotas for EWS diverge from reservation policies for the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other socially and educationally backward classes, by jettisoning caste or community identity as the basis of identifying beneficiary groups
  • Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is limited by the basic structure doctrine, according to which no law can violate the Constitution’s essential features.
  • In order to meet the established constitutional parameters, the conceptualisation and implementation of EWS reservations must satisfy the principle of equality and the constitutional mandate of social justice that are basic features of the Constitution.

IndraSawhney case

  • Before the Supreme Court approved caste as the basis of defining “socially and educationally backward classes” or OBCs in 1992, caste reservations beyond SCs and STs had attracted controversy.
  • In the IndraSawhney case, the Court held that reservations were designed, among other things, to provide a share in power and representation to the classes, which were historically excluded from such avenues.
  • The key to the acceptance of a caste-based interpretation of the OBC category was the Court’s endorsement of the Mandal Commission’s argument that a low caste status represented a form of marginalisation that was so entrenched and trans-generational that it could not be dismantled by either being blind to it, or only through welfare measures.
  • The Court’s observation that reservations are not poverty alleviation programmes should be interpreted in this light.

Aim of reservations

  • Reservations are particularly ineffective for distributing economic benefits but more meaningful in distributing opportunities, as a matter of representation, among the marginalised classes which do not have an adequate share in governance.
  • Thus, reservation policies must be based on empirically-sound and rigorously-applied criteria of backwardness.

Problem with EWS reservation

  • The implementation of the EWS category must thus involve a rigorous empirical process of identifying the criteria of economic backwardness. It cannot be just about relative poverty or poverty plain and simple but must indicate compelling forms of trans-generational poverty that demand measures beyond welfare policies.
  • Only this conceptualisation and procedure will be able to justify the requirements of equality and social justice. The present models adopted by the Centre and state governments violate these standards.
  • The government has not constituted any commission to conduct a rigorous empirical analysis and instead has chosen income and asset criteria by fiat. They also run into practical and conceptual problems such as regarding income criteria as it is unworkable owing to the difficulty in assessing personal incomes in India and the fact that only a fraction of the population pays income tax.

Way forward

  • Defining EWS properly is needed. A commission is required to evolve appropriate criteria and methodologies.
  • Some possibilities are relatively easy to start with such as:
    • Parental education has a strong impact on higher education participation, much higher than even caste or community affiliation.
    • Other economic criteria can supplement parental education status to prepare a composite index of EWS. These could include households headed by females, applicants who belong to rural areas, individuals or households located in notified slums, whose primary income source is manual labour, and who are migrants from poorer states.
    • The index can also contain disqualifications for the creamy layer — ones that exclude households which own a specified portion of land or own living quarters of specified size in cities and towns, an automobile, or have at least one family member with a group A or B job with the Central or state government.

Conclusion

The EWS reservations could add a desirable dimension to India’s reservation scheme. But this would depend on whether the policy is implemented scrupulously in line with the fundamental constitutional precepts.


 

Leave a Reply